Types / Meaning of or Referring to

Average Questions Per Test1.6
Predicted Questions on Modern Test1.4
In order to discuss the meaning of or referring to task, we'll be analyzing a passage that questions whether the Netherland's tulip bulb craze could be characterized as a speculative bubble.

Meaning of or referring to questions are almost easy to identify, and oftentimes will have specific line references (e.g., "lines 30–36"), as does the example question we pulled from the sample questions LSAC provides on its website. For those questions, we suggest pausing after reading those lines, answering the question, and then return to reading the passage. It's easy to identify the "line reference" questions by just skimming through the question stems, as the numbers and/or parenthesis should jump out at you.

The concept behind this Canadian game show is pretty close to the LSAT's task of restating exactly what the author's evidence means.

Some sample question stems from modern LSATs are:

In using the phrase “[phrase]” (line 25), the author of passage A most clearly means to refer to [the actor's

The author most likely intends to include which one of the following [meanings] among the “[phrase]” referred to in line 50?
Which one of the following assertions from passage A most clearly exemplifies what the author of passage B means in calling [topic] a “[phrase]” (lines 30–33)?
This explicit evidence task most often requires the examinee to consider the question stem's highlighted text within the somewhat narrow context of the lines surrounding it; rarely, however, the question will require the reader to orient the highlighted text within the passage's overall argument. As such, it's often quite helpful to actively read the passage and highlight changes in topic and structure, as meaning of or referring to questions will necessarily be explicit pieces of evidence that the author uses to build his or her argument.

The question stem for today's sample provides some helpful focusing issues for the reader.

6. The phrase “standard pricing pattern“ as used in line 38 most
    nearly means a pricing pattern
Before we can even get to the sample question today, though, we of course need to go over the passage. As a reminder, the Zen system suggests skimming the question stems for the entire passage, taking note of the ones with line references, and then notating the passage with the question numbers along the the passage's margins. In this case, you should actively read the passage up until about about line 40, then move on to answer the question before continuing:

       In economics, the term “speculative bubble
       refers to a large upward move in an asset’s price
       driven not by the asset’s fundamentals—that is, by
       the earnings derivable from the asset—but rather by
(5)   mere speculation that someone else will be willing to
       pay a higher price for it. The price increase is then
       followed by a dramatic decline in price, due to a loss
       in confidence that the price will continue to rise, and
       the “bubble“ is said to have burst. According to
(10) Charles Mackay’s classic nineteenth-century account,
       the seventeenth-century Dutch tulip market provides
       an example of a speculative bubble. But the
       economist Peter Garber challenges Mackay’s view,
       arguing that there is no evidence that the Dutch tulip
(15) market really involved a speculative bubble.
       By the seventeenth century, the Netherlands had
       become a center of cultivation and development of
       new tulip varieties, and a market had developed in
       which rare varieties of bulbs sold at high prices. For
(20) example, a Semper Augustus bulb sold in 1625 for an
       amount of gold worth about U.S. $11,000 in 1999.
       Common bulb varieties, on the other hand, sold for
       very low prices. According to Mackay, by 1636 rapid
       price rises attracted speculators, and prices of many
(25) varieties surged upward from November 1636 through
       January 1637. Mackay further states that in February
       1637 prices suddenly collapsed; bulbs could not be
       sold at 10 percent of their peak values. By 1739, the
       prices of all the most prized kinds of bulbs had fallen
(30) to no more than one two-hundredth of 1 percent of
       Semper Augustus’s peak price.
       Garber acknowledges that bulb prices increased
       dramatically from 1636 to 1637 and eventually
       reached very low levels. But he argues that this
(35) episode should not be described as a speculative
       bubble, for the increase and eventual decline in bulb
       prices can be explained in terms of the fundamentals.
6.    Garber argues that a standard pricing pattern occurs
       for new varieties of flowers. When a particularly
(40) prized variety is developed, its original bulb sells for
       a high price. Thus, the dramatic rise in the price of
       some original tulip bulbs could have resulted as tulips
       in general, and certain varieties in particular, became
The passage clearly sets up a debate between Mackay and Garber on whether Tulip Mania was a speculative bubble. However, for our purposes today, we're only interested in what the author and Garber meant by describing the tulip's market as a "standard pricing pattern."

6. The phrase “standard pricing pattern“ as used in line 38 most
    nearly means a pricing pattern
(A) against which other pricing patterns are to be measured
(B) that conforms to a commonly agreed-upon criterion
(C) that is merely acceptable
(D) that regularly recurs in certain types of cases
(E) that serves as an exemplar
Answer choice D nicely restates the author's and Garbar's meaning of "standard" with regularly recurs, and "certain types of cases" maps on to the "for a new variety of flowers" in the passage. Note that Garbar is refuting Mackay's stance by saying that Tulip Mania actually conforms to normal, rational economic behavior within the wider flower market

Answer choice E is an excellent distractor: however, "exemplar" implies that some actor was actively trying to create the standard market conditions. Garbar is not arguing that the market was following an exemplar, but rather that it was an example of the expected operations. 

Answer choice A follows this same erroneous reasoning, but the language is much more clearly out of the scope of what Garbar's argument is meaning: we're only talking about the tulip market and not measuring other markets against any standard.

Answer choice B falsely implies that the argument used only one criterion to define the standard, as well implied that others have settled on this after deliberation. We're not told how or why this standard was defined, and thus the answer choice can't impute things that are not present in the passage text.

Answer choice C incorrectly brings a value judgment component to the "standard," which much more closely tracks the "normal" meaning of the word rather than the evaluative meaning.
TestQ #SectionAnswerYour AnswerDistractorDifficulty
June 2007164AEnterEasy
June 2007254DEnterMedium
PT 68251DEnterVery Easy
PT 68271EEnterVery Easy
PT 67121EEnterD
PT 6621DEnter
PT 66251AEnter
PT 6563AEnterMedium
PT 65153BEnterAVery Hard
PT 64184DEnterMedium
PT 64234CEnterMedium
PT 6324CEnterAHard
PT 63114AEnterEasy
PT 63174DEnterMedium
PT 62241BEnterA/DHard
PT 61211EEnterAMedium
PT 6044BEnterEasy
PT 60144EEnterCMedium
PT 60254BEnterAMedium
PT 5974AEnterVery Easy
PT 59164CEnterBHard
PT 5842DEnterAHard
PT 57124BEnterAVery Hard
PT 57214CEnterMedium
PT 56174CEnterBHard
PT 55162CEnterBVery Hard
PT 55272DEnterMedium
PT 53114DEnterCMedium
PT 5254CEnterEasy
PT 52234AEnterD/EHard
PT 5071DEnterMedium
PT 50171DEnterBHard
PT 50271DEnterMedium
PT 49133CEnterDMedium
PT 4883CEnterMedium
PT 48143CEnterAHard
PT 48243EEnterMedium
PT 46171DEnterMedium
PT 46271CEnterEasy
PT 44261BEnterCHard
PT 4341BEnterCVery Hard
PT 43181DEnterVery Easy
PT 42173AEnterMedium
PT 42243DEnterEasy
PT 40184BEnterAHard
PT 3923DEnterVery Easy
PT 3873DEnterEasy
PT 38103AEnterVery Easy
PT 3751AEnterVery Easy
PT 37131AEnterEMedium
PT 37161EEnterVery Easy
PT 36102DEnterCMedium
PT 3592AEnterMedium
PT 3491CEnterVery Easy
PT 34241EEnterMedium
PT 3322AEnterVery Easy
PT 33122CEnterVery Easy
PT 32112BEnterEasy
PT 32162EEnterMedium
PT 31174AEnterEasy
PT 3083CEnterVery Easy
PT 30193AEnterDMedium
PT 29262CEnterBMedium
PT 2894DEnterBHard
PT 28194CEnterBVery Hard
PT 28244DEnterBHard
PT 2723AEnterMedium
PT 2634AEnterBHard
PT 2384BEnterVery Easy
PT 2241BEnterEasy
PT 22111AEnterMedium
PT 2154BEnterEasy
PT 21154CEnterEasy