Types / Application of or Analogous to

Average Questions Per Test2.2
Predicted Questions on Modern Test2.0
Continuing with the Netherland's tulip bulb craze passage, which we first outlined for the meaning of or referring to standard.

Many application of or analogous to questions are somewhat easy to identify, as they contain a synonym of application or analogous, and will reference or quote the part(s) of the passage that will serve as the comparison to the answer choices. However, some of this strand's question stems will will not have a keyword, but will clearly prompt the examinee to compare or apply the logic in the answer choices to the logic in the referenced portion of the passage. Thus, this task is part of the extrapolation strand, as it requires you to take information from the author's text and expand upon it or apply it in a new situation. 

The example question we pulled from the sample questions LSAC provides on its website is pretty standard in its form, but some other sample question stems from modern LSATs are:

The relationship between the ways in which [countries'] common law and [ancient civilization's] law treat [subject], as described in the passages, is most analogous to the relationship between which one of the following pairs?

Which one of the following is most analogous to the process, described in the last paragraph, by which the [phenomenon] can be curtailed?

Based on the passage, which one of the following scenarios is most similar to some [field’s] scholars’ use of the [theoretical] principle regarding the [policty] debate?

The explanation of the utility maximization principle in the passage suggests that which one of the following would be most appropriately described as a rational response to [phenomenon]?

The Colbert Report applies an MIT study: longer essays get better scores on the SAT despite errors or evidence, so ideally your writing section should read like Glenn Beck's teleprompter.

This extrapolation task most often requires the examinee to consider the question stem's highlighted text within the broader context of the passage's argument. As with the extrapolation strand in logical reasoning, you want to be paying special attention to the referenced topic's actors, relationships, and degrees of certainty. While reading through the passage, you should be actively marking these structural components anyway, as we describe in detail for the main idea and primary purpose tasks. When presented with an application of or analogous to question, you should return to the referenced text's signposts in the passage and cleanly restate who the actors are, how they are related, and how certain we are about each.

The question stem for today's sample provides some helpful focusing issues for the reader.
7. Given Garber’s account of the seventeenth-century Dutch
    tulip market, which one of the following is most analogous to
    someone who bought a tulip bulb of a certain variety in that
    market at a very high price, only to sell a bulb of that variety at
    a much lower price?
It's worth noting that the question is only focused from Garber's point of view; the passage presents both Garbar's opinion and that of Mackay, and a savvy examinee will be sure to make clear structural marks to indicate when the author is presenting which POV. Before we can even get to the full sample question today, though, we of course need to go over the passage.
       In economics, the term “speculative bubble
       refers to a large upward move in an asset’s price
       driven not by the asset’s fundamentals—that is, by
       the earnings derivable from the asset—but rather by
(5)   mere speculation that someone else will be willing to
       pay a higher price for it. The price increase is then
       followed by a dramatic decline in price, due to a loss
       in confidence that the price will continue to rise, and
       the “bubble“ is said to have burst. According to
(10) Charles Mackay’s classic nineteenth-century account,
       the seventeenth-century Dutch tulip market provides
       an example of a speculative bubble. But the
       economist Peter Garber challenges Mackay’s view,
       arguing that there is no evidence that the Dutch tulip
(15) market really involved a speculative bubble.
       By the seventeenth century, the Netherlands had
       become a center of cultivation and development of
       new tulip varieties, and a market had developed in
       which rare varieties of bulbs sold at high prices. For
(20) example, a Semper Augustus bulb sold in 1625 for an
       amount of gold worth about U.S. $11,000 in 1999.
       Common bulb varieties, on the other hand, sold for
       very low prices. According to Mackay, by 1636 rapid
       price rises attracted speculators, and prices of many
(25) varieties surged upward from November 1636 through
       January 1637. Mackay further states that in February
       1637 prices suddenly collapsed; bulbs could not be
       sold at 10 percent of their peak values. By 1739, the
       prices of all the most prized kinds of bulbs had fallen
(30) to no more than one two-hundredth of 1 percent of
       Semper Augustus’s peak price.
       Garber acknowledges that bulb prices increased
       dramatically from 1636 to 1637 and eventually
       reached very low levels. But he argues that this
(35) episode should not be described as a speculative
       bubble, for the increase and eventual decline in bulb
       prices can be explained in terms of the fundamentals.
       Garber argues that a standard pricing pattern occurs
       for new varieties of flowers. When a particularly
(40) prized variety is developed, its original bulb sells for
       a high price. Thus, the dramatic rise in the price of
       some original tulip bulbs could have resulted as tulips
       in general, and certain varieties in particular, became
       fashionable. However, as the prized bulbs become
(45) more readily available through reproduction from the
       original bulb, their price falls rapidly; after less than
       30 years, bulbs sell at reproduction cost. But this
       does not mean that the high prices of original bulbs
       are irrational, for earnings derivable from the millions
(50) of bulbs descendant from the original bulbs can be
       very high, even if each individual descendant bulb
       commands a very low price. Given that an original
       bulb can generate a reasonable return on investment
       even if the price of descendant bulbs decreases
(55) dramatically, a rapid rise and eventual fall of tulip bulb
       prices need not indicate a speculative bubble.
The passage clearly sets up a debate between Mackay and Garber on whether Tulip Mania was a speculative bubble. However, for our purposes today, we're only interested in how Garber describes the original purchaser of an expensive bulb and sold that same variety for a low cost later. Once again, after reading the question stem, you should try and prephrase the actors, their relationships, and our degree of certainty about each before approaching the questions.
7. Given Garber’s account of the seventeenth-century Dutch
    tulip market, which one of the following is most analogous to
    someone who bought a tulip bulb of a certain variety in that
    market at a very high price, only to sell a bulb of that variety at
    a much lower price?
A good examinee would return (either mentally or physically) to the passage's third paragraph, where Garber's argument is fully described. The question stem tells you to focus on the buyer of the expensive tulip bulb who eventually sells versions of that bulb at a much lower price--the best examinees will realize that the question is referring to "original" and "descendant" bulbs from the text and make note of this relationship between the buyer, the original bulb, the descendant bulbs, and the ability to make a profit even with low prices because of the large number of descendant bulbs.
                                                                                                                But this
       does not mean that the high prices of original bulbs
       are irrational, for earnings derivable from the millions
(50) of bulbs descendant from the original bulbs can be
       very high, even if each individual descendant bulb
       commands a very low price.

With this prephrase in mind, we can compare the actors, their relationships, and the degree of certainty to the answer choices.
(A) someone who, after learning that many others had
      withdrawn their applications for a particular job,
      applied for the job in the belief that there would
      be less competition for it
(B) an art dealer who, after paying a very high price for
      a new painting, sells it at a very low price because
      it is now considered to be an inferior work
(C) someone who, after buying a box of rare motorcycle
      parts at a very high price, is forced to sell them
      at a much lower price because of the sudden
      availability of cheap substitute parts
(D) a publisher who pays an extremely high price for a
      new novel only to sell copies at a price affordable
      to nearly everyone
(E) an airline that, after selling most of the tickets for
      seats on a plane at a very high price, must sell the
      remaining tickets at a very low price
Answer choice D nicely analogizes the Garbar's argumentation of turning an expensive single original product into a profitable business by selling many copies of that original at a lower price. All of the important actors from the tulip market are replicated: buyer/seller, original bulb, descendant bulb. The relationships are similarly analogous, with an expensive price for the original product and a much lower price for the copies. Additionally, noted that D does not imply that the buyer/seller is forced to do anything because of market conditions: this is the standard business model for this market, and thus the buyer/seller plans to sell the copies at a low price in order to recoup their high initial cost.

Answer choice C and E clearly violate this important relationship between the buyer/seller and his descendant bulbs: although Mackay describes Tulip Mania as forcing original buyers to sell at a low price, you must note that the question stem clearly limits our application of the ideas from within Garber's argument.

Answer choice A introduces extraneous elements: actors (other applicants) and a relationship in the decision making process (less market competition) that simply doesn't exist in the passage.

Answer choice B is the most attractive distractor, as it has many of the actors and relationships from the passage. However, it is missing the crucial descendant bulb actors, and actively misstates the relationship between the original high and subsequent low price. Garber's opinion is that the original bulb's owner created copies to sell them cheaply and recoup costs, not because others had judged the tulips to be inferior.
TestQ #SectionAnswerYour AnswerDistractorDifficulty
June 200724DEnterEasy
June 2007184CEnterEHard
PT 68121BEnterDHard
PT 68201BEnterAHard
PT 67101CEnter
PT 67131AEnter
PT 67181BEnter
PT 65193DEnterE/CVery Hard
PT 65253BEnterHard
PT 65273BEnterD/EVery Hard
PT 6434EEnterMedium
PT 6444BEnterEasy
PT 64214BEnterMedium
PT 6374CEnterAHard
PT 63194CEnterAHard
PT 6281DEnterEVery Hard
PT 6291AEnterBVery Hard
PT 6161AEnterMedium
PT 61101CEnterBHard
PT 61231EEnterMedium
PT 61271BEnterMedium
PT 60214BEnterVery Easy
PT 5924CEnterMedium
PT 59154AEnterEHard
PT 59194CEnterEasy
PT 58172AEnterEasy
PT 58232BEnterAHard
PT 5774CEnterAMedium
PT 57154CEnterEMedium
PT 5624DEnterHard
PT 56204AEnterMedium
PT 56244AEnterB/DHard
PT 55172BEnterEasy
PT 55232DEnterB/CHard
PT 54151CEnterHard
PT 5394CEnterAHard
PT 52114BEnterEasy
PT 52164DEnterEMedium
PT 52244BEnterEasy
PT 51202AEnterB/DHard
PT 50191DEnterBHard
PT 50281BEnterA/CHard
PT 4933EEnterEasy
PT 49233BEnterEasy
PT 4893AEnterMedium
PT 4772CEnterEasy
PT 47142AEnterVery Easy
PT 46261EEnterBHard
PT 4522BEnterEasy
PT 44221AEnterEHard
PT 4351EEnterEasy
PT 43101DEnterVery Easy
PT 43151EEnterEasy
PT 43241BEnterA/CHard
PT 4233AEnterCHard
PT 42113EEnterHard
PT 4154BEnterMedium
PT 4184EEnterEasy
PT 4074AEnterEasy
PT 40164DEnterAVery Hard
PT 40234DEnterEHard
PT 39163BEnterMedium
PT 38183AEnterMedium
PT 38203CEnterBMedium
PT 38223DEnterMedium
PT 34121EEnterCHard
PT 34211DEnterMedium
PT 3342BEnterEMedium
PT 33212CEnterEMedium
PT 32122DEnterEasy
PT 32192BEnterEasy
PT 3154DEnterEasy
PT 31184AEnterMedium
PT 31274DEnterVery Easy
PT 31284EEnterCHard
PT 3033DEnterVery Easy
PT 30113EEnterEasy
PT 30243DEnterEasy
PT 29112CEnterMedium
PT 29192CEnterBMedium
PT 2874EEnterDVery Hard
PT 28104AEnterEasy
PT 28174BEnterMedium
PT 27103EEnterEasy
PT 27173AEnterVery Easy
PT 26114CEnterHard
PT 26164AEnterDMedium
PT 25201BEnterMedium
PT 2441DEnterVery Easy
PT 24181AEnterEasy
PT 24261EEnterMedium
PT 23164EEnterEasy
PT 23214CEnterEasy
PT 22161AEnterBMedium
PT 22261AEnterEasy
PT 21114BEnterMedium
PT 21204BEnterVery Easy
PT 2052DEnterMedium
PT 20122BEnterAHard
PT 20242EEnterMedium
PT 1983CEnterMedium
PT 19163EEnterMedium